Формирование благоориентированной официальной помощи: анализ межстрановых различий
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/1993-7601-2024-74-124-143Ключевые слова:
альтруизм, коллаборативные механизмы, благоориентированная помощь, философия сотрудничества, панельный анализ данныхАннотация
На основе 18 доноров ОЭСР за период 2010–2019 гг. изучены межстрановые различия в формировании благоориентированного мотива помощи развивающимся странам. Исследование тестирует теоретические детерминанты, отмеченные в философии сотрудничества, на двух подвыборках доноров: с преобладанием бескорыстного мотива и со смешанной мотивацией. Проведенный анализ показал, что для первой группы стран значимыми факторами благоориентированности являются благосостояние и просоциальность, для второй—технологическое развитие. Компоненты гражданской культуры, такие как толерантность, доверие, вовлеченность населения в политические решения, вероятно, играют весомую роль вне зависимости от типа донора. Кроме того, в работе исследованы ключевые различия в связях между внутристрановой и международной помощью. Полученные результаты расширяют представление о культурно-исторических контекстах «развязывания» помощи как одной из центральных задач ОЭСР.Организации
Автор выражает благодарность научному руководителю — академику РАН В. М. Полтеровичу за большое внимание к работе и поддержку, профессору А. А. Пересецкому за ценные замечания, и двум анонимным рецензентам.Скачивания
Библиографические ссылки
Алмонд Г., Верба С. (2014). Гражданская культура. Политические установки и демократия в пяти странах. М.: Мысль.
Микитчук М. Д. (2022). Факторы формирования альтруистического поведения. Экономика и математические методы, 58 (3), 28–44. DOI: 10.31857/S042473880021695-3.
Микитчук М. Д. (2023). Факторы формирования благоориентированной международной помощи развивающимся странам. Экономика и математические методы, 59 (3), 56–68. DOI: 10.31857/S042473880026991-9.
Полтерович В. М. (2018). К общей теории социально-экономического развития. Часть 2. Эволюция механизмов координации. Вопросы экономики, 12, 77–102. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2018-12-77-102.
Полтерович В. М. (2022). Конкуренция, сотрудничество и удовлетворенность жизнью. Ч. 2. Основа лидерства. Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз, 15 (3), 31–43. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.2.
ОЭСР (2005). Парижская декларация по повышению эффективности внешней помощи. https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/35023545.pdf.
Ali M., Banks G., Parsons N. (2015). Why donors give aid and to whom? A critique of the historical and contemporary aid allocation regime. The Dialogue, 10, 116–131.
Almond G., Verba S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. SAGE.
Apodaca C. (2017). Foreign aid as foreign policy tool. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.332.
Brecher R. A, Bhagwati J. N. (1982). Immiserizing transfers from abroad. Journal of International Economics, 13, 353–364.
Cazotte H. (2020). The US elite consensus on aid. In: Aid power and politics, I.Olivie and A.Perez (eds.). New York: Routledge.
Chun H.-M., Munyi E. N., Lee H. (2010). South Korea as an emerging donor: Challenges and changes on its entering OECD/DAC. Journal of International Development, 22 (6), 788–802.
Dalgaard C.-J. (2008). Donor policy rules and aid effectiveness. Journal of Economics and Control, 32, 1895–1920.
Fuchs A., Vadlamannati K. C. (2012). The needy donor: An empirical analysis of India’s aid motives. Discussion paper series, 532, 1–40. DOI: 10.11588/heidok.00013577.
Gounder R. (2014). Australian and New Zealand response to aid and trade: Regional impact results. The Business & Management Review, 5 (1), 367–377.
Gulrajani L., Calleja R. (2019). The principles aid index. https://principled-aid-index.odi.digital.
La Chimia A. (2013). Tied aid and development aid procurement in the framework of EU and WTO law: The imperative for change. Oxford: Hart Publisher.
Lancaster C. (2006). Foreign aid: Diplomacy, development and domestic politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lightfoot S., Obrovsky M. (2016). Austrian development policy—from global to neighborhood policy? Austrian Journal of Political Science, 45 (2), 11–21. DOI: 10.15203/ozp.1088.vol45iss2.
Lopez L. (2017). Causal links between bilateral aid and exports: The Swiss case. IRENE Working Paper, 17 (5). University of Neuchâtel.
Lumsdaine D. (1993). Moral vision in international politics: The foreign aid regime 1949–1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McLean E. V. (2015). Multilateral aid and domestic economic interests. International Organization, 69, 97–130. DOI:10.1017/S0020818314000289.
Mikitchuk M. (2022). Socio-economic determinants of altruistic behavior. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 58 (3), 28–44 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S042473880021695-3.
Mikitchuk M. (2023). Socio-economic determinants of official benefit-oriented aid to developing countries. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 59 (3), 56–68 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S042473880026991-9.
Miquel-Florensa J. M. (2007). Aid effectiveness: A comparison of tied and untied aid. Working Paper 2007_3. York University.
OECD (1991). The tying of aid. https://www.oecd.org/development/pgd/29412505.pdf.
OECD (2005). Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness. https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/35023545.pdf.
OECD (2014). OECD development co-operation peer reviews: United Kingdom 2014. https://www.oecd.org/dac/peer-reviews/UK%20peer%20review%202014.pdf.
OECD (2022). Report on the implementation of the DAC recommendation on untying official development assistance. https://one.oecd.org/document/DCD/DAC(2022)34/FINAL/en/pdf.
Polterovich V. (2017). Positive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolution. Russian Journal of Economics, 3, 24–41.
Polterovich V. M. (2018). Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 77–102 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2018-12-77-102.
Polterovich V. M. (2022). Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament of leadership—collaborative advantage. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15 (3), 42–57 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.2.
Stokke O. (2020). The Scandinavians: Aid policy determinants and performances. In: Aid power and politics, I.Olivie and A.Perez (eds.). New York: Routledge.
Wickstead M. (2020). The UK: An aid superpower at a crossroads. In: Aid power and politics, I.Olivie and A.Perez (eds.). New York: Routledge.
Mikitchuk M. (2022). Socio-economic determinants of altruistic behavior. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 58 (3), 28–44 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S042473880021695‑3.
Mikitchuk M. (2023). Socio-economic determinants of official benefit‑ oriented aid to developing countries.
Economics and Mathematical Methods, 59 (3), 56–68 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S042473880026991‑9.
Polterovich V . M. (2018). Towards a general theory of socio‑economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 77–102 (in Russian).
DOI: 10.32609/0042‑8736‑2018‑12‑77‑102.
Polterovich V . M. (2022). Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament
of leadership — collaborative advantage. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15 (3), 42–57 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.2.
OECD (2005). Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness. https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/35023545.pdf.
Ali M., Banks G., Parsons N. (2015). Why donors give aid and to whom? A critique of the historical and contemporary aid allocation regime. The Dialogue, 10, 116–131.
Almond G., Verba S. (1989). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. SAGE.
Apodaca C. (2017). Foreign aid as foreign policy tool. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.332.
Brecher R. A, Bhagwati J. N. (1982). Immiserizing transfers from abroad. Journal of International Economics, 13, 353–364.
Cazotte H. (2020). The US elite consensus on aid. In: Aid power and politics, I.Olivie and A.Perez (eds.). New York: Routledge.
Chun H.-M., Munyi E. N., Lee H. (2010). South Korea as an emerging donor: Challenges and changes on its entering OECD/DAC. Journal of International Development, 22 (6), 788–802.
Dalgaard C.-J. (2008). Donor policy rules and aid effectiveness. Journal of Economics and Control, 32, 1895–1920.
Fuchs A., Vadlamannati K. C. (2012). The needy donor: An empirical analysis of India’s aid motives. Discussion paper series, 532, 1–40. DOI: 10.11588/heidok.00013577.
Gounder R. (2014). Australian and New Zealand response to aid and trade: Regional impact results. The Business & Management Review, 5 (1), 367–377.
Gulrajani L., Calleja R. (2019). The principles aid index. https://principled-aid-index.odi.digital.
La Chimia A. (2013). Tied aid and development aid procurement in the framework of EU and WTO law: The imperative for change. Oxford: Hart Publisher.
Lancaster C. (2006). Foreign aid: Diplomacy, development and domestic politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lightfoot S., Obrovsky M. (2016). Austrian development policy—from global to neighborhood policy? Austrian Journal of Political Science, 45 (2), 11–21. DOI: 10.15203/ozp.1088.vol45iss2.
Lopez L. (2017). Causal links between bilateral aid and exports: The Swiss case. IRENE Working Paper, 17 (5). University of Neuchâtel.
Lumsdaine D. (1993). Moral vision in international politics: The foreign aid regime 1949–1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McLean E. V. (2015). Multilateral aid and domestic economic interests. International Organization, 69, 97–130. DOI:10.1017/S0020818314000289.
Mikitchuk M. (2022). Socio-economic determinants of altruistic behavior. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 58 (3), 28–44 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S042473880021695-3.
Mikitchuk M. (2023). Socio-economic determinants of official benefit-oriented aid to developing countries. Economics and Mathematical Methods, 59 (3), 56–68 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S042473880026991-9.
Miquel-Florensa J. M. (2007). Aid effectiveness: A comparison of tied and untied aid. Working Paper 2007_3. York University.
OECD (1991). The tying of aid. https://www.oecd.org/development/pgd/29412505.pdf.
OECD (2005). Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness. https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/35023545.pdf.
OECD (2014). OECD development co-operation peer reviews: United Kingdom 2014. https://www.oecd.org/dac/peer-reviews/UK%20peer%20review%202014.pdf.
OECD (2022). Report on the implementation of the DAC recommendation on untying official development assistance. https://one.oecd.org/document/DCD/DAC(2022)34/FINAL/en/pdf.
Polterovich V. (2017). Positive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolution. Russian Journal of Economics, 3, 24–41.
Polterovich V. M. (2018). Towards a general theory of socio-economic development. Part 2. Evolution of coordination mechanisms. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 12, 77–102 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2018-12-77-102.
Polterovich V. M. (2022). Competition, collaboration, and life satisfaction. Part 2. The fundament of leadership—collaborative advantage. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15 (3), 42–57 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.2.
Stokke O. (2020). The Scandinavians: Aid policy determinants and performances. In: Aid power and politics, I.Olivie and A.Perez (eds.). New York: Routledge.
Wickstead M. (2020). The UK: An aid superpower at a crossroads. In: Aid power and politics, I.Olivie and A.Perez (eds.). New York: Routledge.
